The Economist Intelligence Unit's (EIU)
most recent global liveability report[1]
shows cities in Canada, Australia, Austria, Finland and New Zealand as the
ideal destinations, thanks to a widespread availability of goods and services,
low personal risk, and an effective infrastructure. It does not take into
account climate or the cost of living as a factor in 'liveability.' The
Economist Intelligence Unit has been criticized by the New
York Times for being overly anglocentric, stating that "The
Economist clearly equates livability with speaking English."[4]
Their August 2012 report placed Melbourne, Australia as
the most livable city in the world, with Vienna, Austria taking
second place, followed by Vancouver, Canada[2],
unchanged from the top three the previous year.[5]
There was controversy related to the lowering of Vancouver's rating due to
traffic congestion, as the example given was a location on the Malahat Highway,
90 kilometers away from the city and on Vancouver
Island. A clarifying statement on the website stated that "The Malahat
closures were meant to provide an example of the congestion that has affected
the region as a whole."[6]
No comments:
Post a Comment